,
 
Edorium Journal of

Respiratory Medicine

 
Editorial
 
Metabolomics approach applied to exhaled breath condensate in lung cancer
Mauro Maniscalco1, Salvatore Fuschillo1
1Respiratory Rehabilitation Unit, ICS Maugeri SpA SB, Institute of Telese Terme (Benevento), Italy

Article ID: 100003R05MM2017
doi:10.5348/R05-2017-3-ED-1

Address correspondence to:
Maniscalco Mauro MD.
PhD, Via Bagni Vecchi 1
Telese Terme (BN)
Italy

Access full text article on other devices

  Access PDF of article on other devices

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text] [Print This Article]
[Similar article in Pumed] [Similar article in Google Scholar]

How to cite this article
Maniscalco M, Fuschillo S. Metabolomics approach applied to exhaled breath condensate in lung cancer. Edorium J Respir Med 2017;3:1–3.


Introduction

Several studies on lung cancer research have been performed with the aim of revealing biomarkers representative of the cancer phenotype as well as possible therapeutic targets. This has led to the identification of many molecular features involved in lung cancer with new biochemical adaptations in the carcinogenetic process with quantitative changes in endogenous metabolites [1]. Recently, omics sciences have arising interest in cancer research as they could potentially detect new biomarkers, improving disease diagnosis and evaluating the effect of the treatment [2].

Among all omics, metabolomics is currently, one of the fastest developing disciplines in cancer research. In fact, metabolomics is the comprehensive assessment of endogenous metabolites (metabolome) and attempts to systematically identify and quantify metabolites from a biological specimen in a both global and targeted manner [3] [4]. The application of metabolomics to cancer is increasing year by year in the search for candidate biomarkers that define a particular cancer, whose directional variation is significantly higher than all other endogenous metabolites that comprise the complex sample for analysis.

Metabolomics methods usually use nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) and mass spectrometry (MS). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy can be considered as a universal metabolite detection technique. Nuclear magnetic resonance studies molecules by recording the interaction of radiofrequency electromagnetic radiation with the nuclei placed in a strong magnetic field [5]. Mass spectrometry consists in producing gas-phase ions that are further detected and characterized by their mass and charge [6] .

Although metabolomics analyses may be applied to several biological matrix such as plasma, urine sputum, the respiratory tract offers a natural matrix, the exhaled breath, which appears well suited for the metabolomics studies [7][8][9][10]. In fact exhaled breath condensate (EBC), obtained by cooling exhaled air from spontaneous tidal breathing, represent a non-invasive method of collecting samples of the airway-lining fluid on which metabolomics methodology can be fruitfully applied [11].


Exhaled breath condensate metabolomics and lung cancer

Recently, metabolomics-based analysis has been applied to exhaled breath condensate in lung cancer. In 2016, Peralbo-Molina et al. [12] applied metabolomics analysis on EBC to discriminate between patients with lung cancer and those at risk for lung cancer. Untargeted analysis, using gas chromatography time-of-flight mass spectrometry, was conducted in a cohort of patient with lung cancer, risk factor individuals (active smokers and ex-smokers) and control healthy individuals in order to detect the EBC metabolic signature within risk and cancer affected individuals. Five compounds were significant in the comparison of the lung cancer patients versus the risk factor group. Among these compounds it is worth noting the presence of two saturated monoacylglycerols (monopalmitin and monostearin) and an acyclic triterpenoid (squalene). Monopalmitin and monostearin were characterized by different behaviors: monopalmitin was more concentrated in the risk factor group than the cancer group. On the other hand, monostearin offered an inverse profile, as the risk factor group showed a lower relative concentration than the lung cancer patients.

Subsequently, the same authors identified metabolomics panels for potential lung cancer screening. Metabolite profiles were obtained from lung cancer patients, which were compared to those provided by two additional cohorts: a risk factor group formed by active smokers with at least 20 pack-years of exposure and ex-smokers and a second group including healthy non-smoker individuals. Exhaled breath condensate collected from the three groups of subjects was analyzed. The best panel of metabolites with capability of discrimination between the risk factor cohort and healthy individuals was formed by combination of five metabolites providing a 90.3% specificity, 77.9% sensitivity and 85.1% AUC. Discrimination of lung cancer patients versus the risk factor individuals resulted in one other five-compound panel characterized by sensitivity close to 90%, and a specificity of nearly 70% [13].

Furthermore, in this study, the subjects with the most common lung cancer diagnosis (squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma) were selected to compare their EBC composition with the aim of identify metabolomics differences among lung cancer stages. The authors found that five of these compounds which have benzoic structure with alkyl groups and which could be related to tobacco smoke, were present in the patients with advanced cancer stage.

In another study, Ahmed et al. aimed to determine if H1 MRS of sputum and EBC can identify biomarkers of lung cancer. In the EBC samples, median concentrations some metabolites (propionate, ethanol, acetate, and acetone) were higher in lung cancer patients compared to the patients with benign conditions [14].


Conclusion

Metabolomics applied to exhaled breath condensate (EBC) might represent an important tool for diagnostics, management and follow-up of lung cancer in the future. The development of a series of analytical platforms capable of accurately measuring hundreds or thousands of small molecules in biological samples and specifically in EBC, promises to advance our pathophysiological understanding of lung cancer, identifying early metabolic changes in disease provide an opportunity to develop predictive biomarkers that can trigger earlier interventions.

Keywords: Biomarkers, Lung cancer, Metabolomics


References
  1. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: The metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009 May 22;324(5930):1029–33.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 1
  2. Armitage EG, Ciborowski M. Applications of metabolomics in cancer studies. In: Sussulini A. editor. Metabolomics: From Fundamentals to Clinical Applications. Cham, SWitzerland: Springer International Publishing; 2017. p. 209–34.   [CrossRef]    Back to citation no. 2
  3. Clayton TA, Lindon JC, Cloarec O, et al. Pharmaco-metabonomic phenotyping and personalized drug treatment. Nature 2006 Apr 20;440(7087):1073–7.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 3
  4. Nicholson JK, Lindon JC. Systems biology: Metabonomics. Nature 2008 Oct 23;455(7216):1054–6.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 4
  5. de Laurentiis G, Paris D, Melck D, et al. Metabonomic analysis of exhaled breath condensate in adults by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Eur Respir J 2008 Nov;32(5):1175–83.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 5
  6. Murray KK, Boyd RK, Eberlin MN, Langley GJ, Li L, Naito Y. Definitions of terms relating to mass spectrometry (IUPAC Recommendations 2013). Pure Appl Chem 2013;85(7):1515–609.   [CrossRef]    Back to citation no. 6
  7. de Laurentiis G, Paris D, Melck D, et al. Separating smoking-related diseases using NMR-based metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate. J Proteome Res 2013 Mar 1;12(3):1502–11.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 7
  8. Motta A, Paris D, Melck D, et al. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics of exhaled breath condensate: Methodological aspects. Eur Respir J 2012 Feb;39(2):498–500.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 8
  9. Paris D, Maniscalco M, Melck D, et al. Inflammatory metabolites in exhaled breath condensate characterize the obese respiratory phenotype. Metabolomics 2015;11(6):1934–9.   [CrossRef]    Back to citation no. 9
  10. Maniscalco M, Paris D, Melck DJ, et al. Coexistence of obesity and asthma determines a distinct respiratory metabolic phenotype. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2017 May;139(5):1536–47.e5.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 10
  11. Horváth I, Hunt J, Barnes PJ, et al. Exhaled breath condensate: Methodological recommendations and unresolved questions. Eur Respir J 2005 Sep;26(3):523–48.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 11
  12. Peralbo-Molina A, Calderón-Santiago M, Priego-Capote F, Jurado-Gámez B, Luque de Castro MD. Metabolomics analysis of exhaled breath condensate for discrimination between lung cancer patients and risk factor individuals. J Breath Res 2016 Feb 11;10(1):016011.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 12
  13. Peralbo-Molina A, Calderón-Santiago M, Priego-Capote F, Jurado-Gámez B, Luque de Castro MD. Identification of metabolomics panels for potential lung cancer screening by analysis of exhaled breath condensate. J Breath Res 2016 Mar 23;10(2):026002.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 13
  14. Ahmed N, Bezabeh T, Ijare OB, et al. Metabolic signatures of lung cancer in sputum and exhaled breath condensate detected by 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy: A feasibility study. Magn Reson Insights 2016 Nov 17;9:29–35.   [CrossRef]   [Pubmed]    Back to citation no. 14

[HTML Abstract]   [PDF Full Text]

Author Contributions
Mauro Maniscalco – Substantial contributions to conception and design, Acquisition of data, Analysis and interpretation of data, Drafting the article, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Salvatore Fuschillo – Analysis and interpretation of data, Revising it critically for important intellectual content, Final approval of the version to be published
Guarantor of submission
The corresponding author is the guarantor of submission.
Source of support
None
Conflict of interest
Authors declare no conflict of interest.
Copyright
© 2017 Mauro Maniscalco et al. This article is distributed under the terms of Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium provided the original author(s) and original publisher are properly credited. Please see the copyright policy on the journal website for more information.



  Home line About the Journal line Aim and Scope line Open Access line Archives
Apply as Editor line Apply as Reviewer line Submit Reviews - Editors line Submit Reviews - Reviewers
Instructions for Authors line Templates to Use line Copyright Form line Author Checklist
Online Submission line Email Submission line Submit Revision line Submit All Forms line Submit Page Proofs
Terms of Service line Privacy policy line Disclaimer line FAQ line Contact: Journal line Contact: Edorium Journals line Site Map
 
  Copyright © 2017. Edorium. All rights reserved.